When Semi- is Better than Fully Automatic

semi-auto
Christopher Hatcher published a great article over at 21st Century Supply Chain about when semi-automatic processes are better than automatic ones. As an example, he talks about the exciting day in army basic training when he switched his gun from semi- to fully automatic. His observation is important: accuracy often goes down dramatically. He says,

“I can’t remember if I actually hit any targets that night, but it was so cool to try the automatic setting.”

Many companies go through a similar exciting phase – especially young companies that are learning how to expand their operations. Instead of taking time and really thinking out each move, we often want to find an automatic process that will “just make everything work and not bother me anymore.” When making investment decisions, it’s tempting to buy the Ferrari solution with all the options when the less glamourous bicycle product might actually work better.

In addition to spending too much on the automatic solution, we often create additional problems or miss valuable opportunities by letting processes run on autopilot. Many opportunities for improvement present themselves through deep understanding of how processes work. That understanding can only happen when we participate in the process.

What processes in your business would benefit from switching to semi-auto for a trial period? Which might benefit from a permanent semi-auto setting? Could less automation make some of your processes more efficient in the long-run?

For example, I often learn more from updating important metrics by hand than metrics that update automatically. That extra attention frequently brings me important insights.

Hatcher’s article includes these wise words:

“Running most operations in automatic mode is likely a wise choice, but it’s important to understand which parts of the process can trigger the responsible party to intervene when necessary. Automatic sometimes just scatters lots of bullets with a great deal of sound and fury, but semi-automatic usually hits the target every time.”

Check out the full article here: Will that be automatic or semi-automatic to manage your supply chain?

[Image Source, modified]

Share this article

    2 thoughts on “When Semi- is Better than Fully Automatic

    1. JLambson

      Great article. I’ve found that the more important the process, the more manual I need it to be – especially regarding critical metrics or reports where a small error could lead to large losses. Even if the calculations are automated to reduce human error, it can be vital to review everything line by line. The time spent manually doing things upfront can be painful, but it’s worth it if it helps avoid big problems down the road.

      Reply

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *